🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive action to prohibit social platforms access for those under 16 is creating waves internationally. Officials, campaigners, and parents are monitoring closely to see if this strategy will set a precedent for countries abroad.

Across Europe Momentum

Throughout Europe, a increasing group of nations are exploring similar bans.

• The Danish government plans a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister declaring that mobile devices and networks are "taking away our kids' youth". Legislation is expected to be enacted soon.
• Norway is planning to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard children from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to confirm the age and identity of social media participants. The media minister have indicated that an Australia-style ban could be "a potential options on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has called on lawmakers to enact a law raising the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a related move, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The government in The Netherlands has advised parents to prevent their kids from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has passed a non-binding statement calling for a ban for minors except if parental consent is granted. Even though it cautions of the "habit-forming" nature of these platforms, the move does not enact mandatory rules.

"An effective age limit is a solid starting point," commented the MEP driving the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Stance

Across Britain, the leadership has remained open to a future ban, stating that "no measure is being dismissed" but stressing any action must be "grounded in conclusive research".

Previously, support grew behind a proposal to impose controls on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately modified. However, the government committed to further research the matter.

Advocacy groups have expressed apprehensions. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a teenager who took her own life after being exposed to disturbing social media material argues that a blanket age ban could fail to improve online safety and could result in a "dangerous transition" of harm when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the refusal of the tech sector to design tools that are appropriate and fit for minors," commented a influential peer.

The US: A Decentralized Landscape

In the United States, legislation is mostly unfolding at the state level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• Utah demands guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has signed a bill barring those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• The state of Virginia has approved a regulation restricting minors to one hour of social media time per day, with any further time needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also passed laws requiring guardian approval for under-16s to create social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from some figures to copy this lead, a nationwide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

International Perspectives

Beyond these regions, further countries are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, international agencies adopt a more cautious tone. Unicef has warned that social media bans carry risks and "could prove counterproductive". The agency highlights that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for isolated youth and that bans should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to prioritize safety.

While this worldwide debate unfolds, the steps of Australia and its followers indicate that states internationally are increasingly prepared to stand by for the industry to make changes on their own.